Programmable AC power sources have been widely used to implement and support numerous product test procedures over the years. They provide the test engineer with the ability to fully control voltage, frequency, and current to the unit under test (UUT). Products like these are used to simulate various power conditions and anomalies that are likely to occur in actual use of AC and DC powered products. They also are essential for providing the requisite 400-Hz or 800-Hz frequency AC power for military and avionics power subsystems.

These types of instruments provide the following features and benefits to the design and/or test engineer:

  • safety isolation between the AC grid input and UUT output;
  • conversion of any grid voltage and frequency found around the world to a specific desired output frequency to the UUT;
  • precise control over output voltage, including line and load regulation;
  • stable and controlled output power, immune to any AC line input fluctuations or momentary voltage drops; and
  • phase conversion from single-phase to three-phase, single-phase to split-phase, or three-phase to single-phase.

Conventional AC source topologies and design

The vast majority of available AC power source designs are based on pulse-width-modulated control circuits and the use of low-frequency transformers to provide isolation between input and output of the AC power source.

These PWM designs generally use analog control circuits to provide output regulation, current-limit functions, and frequency-conversion functions. While this is a proven design dating back to the early 1980s, it is fraught with drawbacks. To list a few:

  • The use of line frequency AC input transformers to provide galvanic isolation adds significant size and weight to the product, especially as power levels increase. For example, accounting for transformer losses, a 15-kVA AC source will require a 17-kVA three-phase input transformer weighing approximately 140 lb. Power sources using this design can weigh well over 400 lb. total.
  • The use of output transformers to provide galvanic isolation causes similar increases in size and weight and prevents the capability to generate DC output capability. Furthermore, such output transformers must support the wide frequency range associated with programmable AC power sources, typically from 45 Hz to 1,000 Hz or higher, requiring more complex and costly transformer designs.
  • Analog control loops are affected by discrete-component variations and temperature drift. This negatively impacts accuracy and stability, and it requires adjustment pots for calibration.

A simplified block diagram of this topology is shown in Figure 1. It shows a single-phase input, single-phase output source, but a three-phase version is similar in design.

Figure 1. Conventional AC power source topology

Some manufacturers augment this approach with some digital signal processor (DSP) control functions, but often they are part of the outer, and thus slower, control loops of the amplifier or relegated to user-interface and front-panel control functions. Variations on this topology can be found in designs such as direct-coupled output stages with dual inverters in series/parallel mode to eliminate output transformers, which eliminates the need for output transformers but comes at a higher cost.

Digital power conversion

The higher PWM switching speeds required to support the wide output frequency range of an AC source, often higher than 30 kHz, have made it difficult to use DSPs to provide all control functions. With the advent of recent advances in performance and cost of DSP technology, a full digital implementation of an AC power source design supporting these switching frequencies now is feasible.

A recent example of this is the Pacific Power AFX Series, introduced this year. This product uses a three-stage, all-digital power converter design. This design eliminates both AC input and output transformers and results in a power density five times higher than similar contemporary products and a four-fold reduction in weight. Figure 2 shows the size of a 15-kVA programmable source using all digital design vs. a conventional analog 15-kVA power source.

Figure 2. 15-kVA programmable source using all digital design (left) vs. a conventional analog 15-kVA power source (right)

All-digital-control advantages

Using all-digital control of critical power conversion stages eliminates a lot of the tolerances and variations associated with analog components and control circuits. Furthermore, the capability to monitor and control switching events in real time, on a cycle-by-cycle basis at the PWM switching frequency, yields greater protection against load- or line-induced anomalies that may occur. This level of protection is no longer subject to analog filtering and averaging, which introduces delays in conventional power source designs.

These advances allow the following topology changes:

  • Replacing an AC input transformer used for isolation with an active power-factor-corrected AC/DC conversion stage followed by a very-high-frequency DC/DC conversion stage with galvanic isolation dramatically reduces the size and weight of the input stage components.
  • Replacing any output transformers or series/parallel output inverter stages with a single high-output-voltage inverter supports both low-voltage/high-current and high-voltage/lower-current requirements.

This digital control-based topology is shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3. Digital AC power source topology

The use of all-digital controls yields a number of advantages:

  • lower weight and smaller size due to the elimination of input and output transformers,
  • higher power density and lower losses due to increased efficiency and high switching frequency for the reduction of output filter inductor size,
  • reduced output switching noise as a result of higher PWM switching speeds and improved digital filtering,
  • a wider AC voltage input range with active power factor correction, and
  • a constant power output voltage range for a wider operating area while eliminating the need for dual output ranges and associated range switching.

Other design innovations

Using an experienced team of engineers from a variety of industry backgrounds to develop a clean-sheet design has resulted in several additional innovations in both design and construction. To name a few:

  • elimination of failure-prone ribbon cables and interconnects between subassemblies by using a mechanical, layered construction with direct interconnects between boards;
  • a single, high-thermal-mass heat sink that doubles as structural mechanical support for the entire unit to enable low airflow for maximum cooling and reduce audible fan noise;
  • use of multiple networked DSPs to partition critical functions while providing a higher level of redundancy;
  • high-speed, differential-mode serial communication buses between multiple DSPs to enhance noise immunity;
  • an active parallel, master/auxiliary, daisy-chain control interface to allow higher-power systems to be configured by connecting multiple power sources in parallel;
  • a DC coupled output mode with unique DC offset reduction control circuits for minimal DC offset in the AC mode;
  • high overall efficiency, despite using three power-conversion stages; and
  • an energy-efficient sleep mode during idle periods to reduce energy consumption and extend product life.

New user functions made possible

Providing greater control over each internal switching cycle allows unique new user functions aimed at providing greater protection of the UUT. It also minimizes possible damage to the power source itself, resulting from user errors in connections or possible prototype UUT-induced damage. Here are two examples and uses of such functions:

True power and/or apparent power limit functions
The capability to set a programmable current limit and a power limit is important for many UUTs that exhibit constant-power input behavior. A UUT that can operate from a wide AC input range, like 85 VAC through 265 VAC, cannot be protected by only a current-limit function. The same current that protects at 115-V input cannot protect the UUT if the input voltage is changed to 230 V. Only a true power-limit function will do this.

Peak current limit function
This feature allows the user to set a specific peak current limit for a UUT. The AFX power source will monitor actual peak current demanded by the UUT and clamp the peak current as soon as it exceeds the set limit value. This happens at the fundamental output frequency or for each period of the output voltage. It provides a level of protection that cannot be obtained using rms or average current limit protection functions alone.

System integrator and life-cycle support

With increasing support life requirements for many ATE systems already deployed, having the ability to install a significantly higher power source in a smaller amount of rack space makes power upgrades much easier. With up to 15 kVA of power in 4U of rack space, that represents a significant step up in power density.

Furthermore, included support for industry standards like Ethernet, LXI, USB, SCPI, and available IVI-compliant instrument drivers make upgrades of power cabinets easier. The compact form factor and low weight also allow space to be reclaimed to install other new hardware or upgrades. This factor can extend the life span of aging ATE systems further.
In conclusion, recent advances in DSP throughput and cost have enabled higher switching frequency power-conversion stages, such as those required for instrument-grade programmable power sources to use an all-digital implementation. This design not only improves performance due to the deterministic nature of digital control, it also enables higher levels of protection for both UUTs and the power source itself to be realized.

 


 

About the author

Herman vanEijkelenburg is director of marketing at Pacific Power Source where he is responsible for global strategic marketing and product marketing for several business units under the PPST corporate umbrella including Pacific Power Source, Adaptive Power Systems, and STS Instruments. He also has worked at California Instruments and Fluke. vanEijkelenburg has an M.B.A. from the Pepperdine University George L. Graziadio School of Business and Management, a Bachelor of Economics degree from Universiteit Hasselt, and an M.S.E.E. from Eindhoven University of Technology.

 


 

For more information

LEAVE A REPLY